Section 12 Laws in Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17, 79 and 129, Example (g) Suit for performance of contract sale contract specific, withholding evidence The plaintiff asserts that the defendant was sued by the sale of the suit property. What is the contract? The second installment was paid by the plaintiff by the plaintiff when the plaintiff never posted any public notice in connection with the sale of the objection to the publication of the advertisement, which objected to the purchase of his suit property within a period of 90 days. Was invited, so he did not submit the offer to pay the second installment on breach of contract. On the contrary, the plaintiff suggested that the defendant should immediately occupy the suit property without any further payment. ? Intentions and behaviors of influence are moving in a direction that cannot be called a purpose. The breach of the terms and conditions of the Contract of Sale required by Arts 17 and 79 of Kanun Shah, 1984, did not prove the execution of the agreement by presenting two witnesses, therefore, Article 129, Conan's testimony, The reference to Examples (G) of 1984 was misunderstood; the plaintiff himself failed to present the best evidence without explanation. In the circumstances of his failure, the High Court decided the cases against the plaintiff.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
