Section 342, 365A & 149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 (e) and 21L Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Unlawful imprisonment, kidnapping or abduction or acquittal of property , Valuable security, etc., ordinary goods, kidnapping for ransom, crime of possessing illegal arms, the value of evidence and the accused asked to contact them in a particular village to pay the ransom. In the RI it was stated that he and the witnesses were constantly in contact with the accused to pay the ransom, which kept them on false hopes, and that was because the FIR was almost F The IR was filed after two months. In every possible case, there was the existence of false execution of the accused, so that how much ransom was paid, who received it or who was allegedly paid was not brought to the record complainant. While the court had made many improvements to pay the ransom, the two alleged kidnappers did not state that they had written a letter to the complainant to pay the ransom to the accused. The alleged kidnappers did not say whether the ransom was demanded, or how much was paid to the suspects. Both kidnappers have dismissed that they have identified all eight culprits involved in the case. However, after the return of the alleged kidnappers, an FIR was lodged and only the names of the accused were mentioned in the FIR, the prosecution witness, who was not an eyewitness, also complained of Version of was not supported. He was fired that he could not say, if indeed the accused were illegal
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
