In section 302 (b) the conviction was not taken advantage of by the prosecution's evidence as evidence, misleading, untrustworthy, and impressive reliability of the suspect was alleged to have hurt his head, but as such The material fact of the story was suppressed by eyewitnesses. Investigating officer; and even that was not discussed by the trial court, while recording the unidentified verdict, the Ocular Account revealed that many people had reached the spot, which is the close relationship of the deceased and the complainant. But they did not try to gain much power with the sole attacker / suspect, who was seriously injured. And left safely without resistance when the appearance of the witnesses at the relevant time of the incident was a suspected motive, as alleged, did not prove that the medical evidence was inconsistent with the crime. The evidence regarding the recovery of the weapons and the empty cartridges was unconstitutional, and after the trial court failed to enforce the law on the injured accused, he was released and ordered to release the accused.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2015
