QAMAR-UZ-ZAMAN versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB (JUDICIAL-IV)
Section 10 Horse Breeding Scheme, Condition No. 24 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Application Remote Breeding Tenant Allotment of tenant, ant After the death of the tenant, the land in question was allotted to the respondent who requested his grandson. Was busy. The victim was the half-brother of the tenant and his complaint was that the land could not be allotted to the minor. The provincial government recommended that in the event of the tenancy being vacated on the death of a leaseholder with a good horse / mule breed, it should continue. In the preference of another applicant to be allotted to the deceased's heirs, the applicant was the real brother-in-law of Aloty, who did not fit the legal heritage of the deceased alottie and the District Revenue Officer did not consider this aspect of the case. There is no legal restriction on the leasing of a minor, but the District Revenue Officer did so and illegally deprived the defendant of it. The Provincial Government has retained full discretion in the selection of tenants for public land. ? No one had the right to become a land tenant because the applicant filed was not the legal heir of the slain Altash and there was no tenancy in question and nothing was on record! Applicant's hat case was ever considered by the District Remote Officer, as the respondent in the tenancy allotment was a direct descendant of his grandson, according to the recommendations of the District Remount Officer, track record of the deceased allotment is satisfactory. It was clear that the Board of Revenue had rightly accepted the respondents
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
