Section 7 (e) Conduct of Procedure (XLV of 1860), Abduction Proof FIR for Section 365 ransom, delay in registration, amount of first offenders to victims of trial for press irregularities during police investigation He was convicted of kidnapping. The ransom and the death sentence were given by the complainant in the FIR itself, giving a plausible explanation for the delay, as he was constantly being threatened by the accused and immediately reporting the matter to the police. Could not put his son's life at stake. The explanation / justification was natural and he appealed to the common man as well that the mere delay in filing an FIR was not permanent, or that the prosecution case or the perpetrator's false allegations or conclusive proof of innocence. The kidnapper was the real father of the kidnapper and it was unbelievable that he blamed the false story of the kidnapping of his real son, with whom the accused were involved, impaired performance of sofas. And during the course of the investigation, along with disclosures made by the police in their press conference The slightest anomalies by the police cannot be prioritized nor given the dignity, except that the witnesses' statements and the victims involved in the incident are three pistols, a car and heavy. The ransom was recovered, two of the accused were really brothers. One of them was 21 years old and had grown professionally. All the accused, who had no previous criminal history, were the first offenders and should be treated with respect to the amount of punishment.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
