Sections 2 and 3 of the suit, which was one of the homeowners, the applicants, who was one of the landlords, jointly requested the suit to be distributed to the parties' jointly-owned house for purchase. Give some time for But despite taking advantage of the opportunities, she was ultimately unable to make a statement to her general attorney that the applicant was not in a position to buy the entire property because the trial court did not have enough resources, in the circumstances, Order for sale of property passed. The third person had the right to buy the whole house, but the applicant, one of the partners, to auction it under section 3, Partition Act, 1893, to avoid such a house transfer. Does not benefit from the impugned order passed by the trial court and the appellate court's decision, whereby the house is auctioned, in the absence of any irregularity, Or instability. Against disobedience, dismissed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
