SHEIKH MUHAMMAD AZIM versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN
Sections 9 and 10 apply for bankruptcy petition and refusal to take advantage of the debt of the principal debtor and guarantors to defend the suit for recovery of the loan and claim that the bank is in possession of the bank. Title documents were referred to the trust only to indicate their financial status; and that the guarantees of being a foreign citizen were not present in Pakistan at the relevant time. Proof records show that the principal was indebted after taking the loan. Requested to increase it, which was given against a mortgage of his property and guaranteed bail. The vacation request was not attached to you. In order to show his absence from Pakistan at the time of the execution of the disputed documents, a document was used by the defendant's signature on the contentious documents prepared by the bank to appear on his request for leave and he was in fact giving the loan. It was initially approved in 1998 and extended in 1999 and 2000, but the defendants did not bother to know their property status until they filed a lawsuit in 2006. The guarantors did not deny being the director of the principal indebtedness company, to whom the loan was given, the defendants tried to swallow the debt they received because they were close relatives, they were not shown by the defendants. The purpose of the financing for the purpose of bank was to show the status of the bank. The defendants have confessed to having a business relationship with the bank for the past twenty years. Preparation of fake documents by the bank was not possible because
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
