Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TAHIR NAEEM versus RANA ABAD ALI

O XXX VIII, Suit for Receipt Based on Negotiable Instruments defend Defendant's First Request for Vacation Approval for Not Submitting Request by Defendant Within a Day ? The plaintiff did not take the former party order within the limitation period, therefore, to issue the former party decree to exclude the defendant's second request under Rule O XXXVII, R 4, CPC. The application for finality was dismissed. The disqualification of Parliament Order was rightly dismissed by the trial court. The High Court dismissed the appeal in the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR v. Mst. IQBAL BEGUM 2011 CLC 1342
• BASHIRAN BIBI v. MUHAMMAD SAEEEM 2011 YLR 1345
• NAJAF ALI MAHEY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, PUBLIC PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT, LAHORE 2011 PLC(CS) 1349
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2011 YLR 1350
• AAMER SOHAIL v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1354
• Mst. NUSRAT ARA v. ABDUL QAYYUM 2011 MLD 1355
• ZAHIR TAJ v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 2011 YLR 1355
• Sheikh MUHAMMAD AZIM v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2011 CLD 1361

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

advocates from Sihala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes