Sections 13 (6) and 15 (2) of the tenant landlord's eviction, the personal need for payment of rent controller and the default request for eviction, rent from the tenant Upon compliance with the order of the court, the defendant withheld his defense, and subject to the adjustment of the first payment, the expulsion of the tenant within a period of one month, as well as Rs. 7500 per month in the court of appeal. In addition to collecting future rent at a monthly rate, this also excludes the tenants' order of the tenants / controller of West Pakistan Citizens Rent. The ordinance was approved under section 13 (6) of 1959 and it was not mentioned to the tenant that the order was under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan civilian rent. The Banning Ordinance, 1959, was passed on 22 3 2007, when it suspended the order dated 26-4 2007 under which their defense was terminated and the order of dismissal against it was granted. Further claimed that the order of appeal was based on a misrepresentation of the order of the Pallet Court Rent Controller as the said order was a final order under section 15 (2) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance 1959, the accuracy record revealed. That it was the final order passed under section 15 (2). ) The West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959, was a decree order in which the tenant properly suspended this order by the Appellate Court without following the order of 26 4 2007, dismissing this appeal. That the invalid order was passed under section 13 (6) of the West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance, 1959 and this order is pending in the appellate
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011