KHALID MUHAMMAD KHAN versus INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 2 (5), 3, 4 and 27 of the reference to the High Court Agricultural Land Purchase Tax exemption were a transfer against the sale agreement that it purchased agricultural land against the sale agreement which was profitable and full consideration. According to the contract of sale, the Assessee had paid the sale in full and the seller had given the property to the seller who had paid the sale. Was regularly registered with all concerned. On the basis of such documents, the Registrar transferred his agricultural land under questions in favor of his minor son, which was neither denied nor owned on agricultural land by reviewing the controversial Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. There was no justification for rejecting and treating his claim. Payment for the purchase of this property as a prepayment when it is found that the property is in the property of the property, which was paid in full on the sale and is sold in association with a General Power of Attorney Was the owner of the contract, a portion of the assets of that asset will also be formed. Payment of the management fee was obtained for further sale, in which no evidence of dispute was presented or supported by the record, nor was the document taken by Assisi merely documented. The evidence was supported by the relevant provisions of the law and decisions of the various courts were decided in adverse circumstances. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
