Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DITTA versus MEMBER JUDICIAL, B.O.R.

R19 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The application challenging the applicant's appointment as a lumber holder was dismissed by the Executive District Officer, Revenue Member (Judicial), the Board of Revenue filed a review by the applicant. Deleted. The Supreme Court of Pakistan had declared a violation of the rules of Islam. The unlawful rights conflict was resolved through a forum of special jurisdiction and the legal powers were not open to questioning the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, these motives could not be raised to the same conclusion. In fact, the appointment of a lambardar was essentially an administrative matter and no one had the right to appoint the lambardar as the rules of the appointment of the lambardar to select the most suitable person as a suitable lumberman. Provided guiding principles to legal leaders. The appropriate experience and knowledge could not be challenged in the constitutional jurisdiction to make the appropriate choices. P r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011

• MUHAMMAD ZAHOOR v. State 2011 YLR 1049
• EJAZ MAJEED BHATTI v. PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2011 PLC(CS) 1049
• QAISAR ABBASS v. State 2011 MLD 1051
• KHALID MUHAMMAD KHAN v. INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 2011 PTD 1052
• ILYAS ALI v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary (Education) Punjab, Lahore 2011 PLC(CS) 1057
• MERAJ AGRO, CHEMICAL (PVT.) LIMITED, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE 2011 CLD 1058
• MUHAMMAD ZAFAR v. MEMBER (JUDICIAL-V) BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB 2011 MLD 1059
• AZIZ AHMAD MALIK v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 2011 CLC 1070

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2011 →

ask a advocate free from Kotla Jam lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes