The owner of the Section 9 (c) drug is being prosecuted by the defendant, who had hidden two kilograms of hashish in one of the gates, which was never presented to the court during the trial. However, the police did not prosecute. It was reported how and who was in custody of the sample of marijuana sent to the Chemical Examiner, remained for five days and no official disposed of any objection, according to the prosecution. But the Chemical Examiner's report revealed that only 10 grams of marijuana was obtained at his office, which the chemical parcel containing samples sent to the Chemical Examiner must prove, and Under what circumstances was this position occupied by any officer? At each stage of the proceeding, the prosecution's witnesses admitted to avoiding the possibility of any suspicion arising in this case from the defendant's explanation of the substance recovered by the defendant. Traded to each other in the series, it seemed that the prosecution's case was fraught with serious doubts, which had to be paid to the accused, the accused was acquitted.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
