MUMTAZ AHMAD KHAN versus DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND PHYSICAL PLANNING
Section 8, 39 and 42 Declaration of Title, Acquisition and Document Revocation Principal and Agent, Relationships Power of Attorney Suits The property was purchased by the plaintiff's lawyer by the plaintiff Validity Attorney through his power of attorney's footwear. The Plaintiff had given me full authority to set aside or dispose of the property to the lawyer who performed it as an authority, which in particular gave him so many powers that the Attorney General's Act itself Was considered to be an executive / plaintiff act, therefore, the plaintiff had no choice. Challenging the same plaintiff was a literate individual, he was referred to the headmaster of the high school; therefore, the High Court did not accept his request that he did not consider the contents of the document while performing the General Power of Attorney. What was Calling yourself the major buyer of the property in dispute through oral and documentary evidence, in the course of the decision and the approval of the orders, the court has taken a count of every evidence placed before you and records them with their proper consideration. No partitions were ignored in which lower courts were sought on the question of facts and law. It was not possible to review, disturb, or hold the jurisdiction of the suit based on an appropriate definition of oral and documentary evidence, the following court documents were amended to record material based on the contents of the record. Cannot interfere with edit option. Dismissed in circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2011
