PRESTON EDUCATION PESHAWAR PVT. LTD. THROUGH VICE-CHANCELLOR PRESTON UNIVERSITY versus YOUSAF SHAH
Section 13 Pre-Discrimination Suitability Mohit and Talha Ishtad, performance of the informant's name is mentioned in the notice of the petitioner or not in the plaintiff, his name is presented during the evidence, while during the witness testimony of the notice of Talha Ishid. In order to track the sale of an unclaimed suit, both such grounds would be the basis for exercising a legitimate right to copyright before the performance of the lawsuit, and even a legal weakness in its practice would not be appropriate for the plaintiff. Pre-emptor) could not prove and prove any fact beyond the scope of the claimant, thus, record of such fact. The evidence brought will be disregarded and rejected. In addition to other details, the informant's name should not be specifically mentioned in the notice, but it should be submitted by the pre-emptor through solid and solid evidence. It is important to prove cautiously that before the Emperor Talib failed to prove the first formality of Mohit, the second regular performance of the notice of the arbitrator in such a case, even if it is believed to have been proved, It became unnecessary iv Before such circumstances the emperor was not entitled to give a decree, so, in the circumstances of his case Rejected General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
