Articles 324, 336 and 337F (iii) Defining the evidence The suspect was charged with taking a single shot at the benefit of the suspect, resulting in a simple injury to non-vital parts of the complainant's body. The shot was not repeated, his motive for the murder was not visible on the face of the record. In this case the eyewitnesses were the complainant and his wife, who had a dispute over the land and the parties were adamant against each other under Section 242424, Was not proven against PPC. The suspect, beyond reasonable doubt, was acquitted of the charge under Section 242424, the PPC said, giving him the benefit of the doubt, however, since the incident took place on a broad day and the accused was on top of the complainant's arm. A firing shot was put on the muscle, it would prove to be a crime. Section 337F (iii), covered under PPC. The sentence assigned to it was that the accused would be liable to Damanto and could also be punishable by extension of any term which could extend to three years as the appeal was partially allowed and the provisions. 324 / / 6 336 was tried and convicted, the PPC was set aside and the accused acquitted of the charges, however he was convicted under Section 337F (iii), PPC and earlier. He was sentenced to life imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 50,000 to the complainant as security. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
