Section 497 (5) of the Complaints Regulation (XLV of 1860), cancellation of section 324/148/149 bail, requested more than two hours delay in filing a report to the hospital, was not properly explained. It was reported that they were armed with firearms, but no description of the weapons carried by each of the suspects was in the site plan created by the prosecutor's witness, indicating that one of the suspects was known as Kalashnikov. Went to which he fired at the complainant, but the investigating officer could not recover any of Kalashnikov's vacations by chance, while emptying 30 bore. The matter was imported, which requires further investigation, as it was a case of indiscriminate firing of five suspects due to circumstances which led to the prosecution of one of the more controversial investigations for the purpose of bail. If the bail is approved by the authority, the defendant has been rightfully released on bail on a strong and extraordinary basis, and it is necessary to cancel the order which allows the bail granted by the trial court, or not. It is a breach of the High Court and illegal warranty interference; the request for the cancellation of the bail without any substances. Ridge was, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
