Section 19, O VII, R 10 and O XLIII, R 1 (a) suit for recovery of money in lieu of compensation for wrongful territorial jurisdiction of the court, suit filed by the plaintiff's return court `H plaintiff company Filed a written statement requesting the return of the theft on the basis that the plaintiff's company office was in place. And that it had no business with the territorial limits of `H. And in this case, this court had no jurisdiction. The trial court had allowed the defendant to file the petition and the person or the plaintiff had the right to sue for all sorts of cases arising out of the wrong. C was ordered to return, however, that could be filed as well. At the discretion of the plaintiff; ie either in the court in whose jurisdiction the wrongdoing was committed or within the local jurisdiction where the defendant resided, the business operates or works for profit, irrespective of The defendant was addressed there because of the cause of action. Staying in this place. And also, ignoring the provisions contained in the Constitution, will never prevail, especially when there is no uncertainty about the determination of the jurisdiction of the court, when the court Did not commit illegal or irregularities. The following court order cannot be disturbed by the circumstances
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
