Sections 19 and 22 execute a mortgaged auction of the mortgaged property unlawful and the order dismissing the request for auction by the banking court to verify the auction is supported by the ruling that the significant To date, his lawyer's junior appearance petitioned the court for further adjournment, but his presence was not marked and in the absence of the appellant, it was decided by the petitioner and his Defendant's affidavit affirmed by affidavit to reject this affidavit The filing was not filed, the High Court accepted such an affidavit of indebtedness of the judgment, meaning that they were represented by another lawyer regarding its important date, therefore, the Banking Court Could not prosecute, the auction petitioner objected to the auction, under which a decision-making lender on technical matters could not be denied the opportunity to represent his case. Banking Court sets aside unclean order before the High Court nd instructed the Banking Court to decide the objection request within the stipulated time. r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
