Sections 12 law evidence (10 of 1984), arts 17 (2) (a) and 79 civil code of conduct (v. 1908), section 35 suit for the specific performance of the oral sale agreement except by a witness's examination by the defendant himself. To prove such agreement between the parties and the payment of the dues to the plaintiff. In addition, upon examination by the plaintiff's witness that the plaintiff's lawsuit was filed against him, such admission became suspected as evidence of the defendant's testimony. The interested witness could not be trusted with the statement of the plaintiff's witness because he recorded the statement in favor of the plaintiff in the second case. The plaintiff did not present any receipt in respect of the payment of the dues. The writing was not reduced to the plaintiff's failure to present two witnesses to the sale agreement with the defendant, which was an essential requirement of the law The defendant failed to state the date on which he paid so much The defendant was claiming to prove such an agreement by Burden, with strong evidence, that he should be excluded. Had failed, each person has the right to sue the other for the enforcement of the oral agreement, the failure of the claimant to fail to prove his claim. Section 35A, CPC Suite Defendant \ r \ n was excluded without any such costs.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011