Sections 47 and 115 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), the Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract, were dismissed by the Court of Appeal for the objection filed by the applicant, while the district judge rejected the order and rejected them. Appeal was dismissed. There was no precondition for maintaining the application of the objection under section 47; the objection to the accuracy of the CPC filed under section 47, the CPC was equivalent to a case and the obligation to present the case and record the evidence. Given the job to the implementing court, if necessary, ordering the holder after dismissing the application for the grant of objections to the possession of the disputed property will not preclude the applicant from resolving his complaint to a higher forum, Specifically, when the order of the court implementing the order was present, the appellate court erred and invalidated the relevant procedure. We refuse to enjoy the appeal of the concept. GS was not a condition before the execution order was upheld before the execution court, which by the law resulted in gross misconduct as a result of the appellate court's decision, record of the case as a result of the appellate court's decision. It is necessary to decide the objection court. Guarantee the interference of the High Court justice under Section 115, CPCP
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
