In the case of a preliminary appointment to Section 13, as stated in the preamble, the performance of the sale through the work registered at the request of the claimant on 4-4 2007 2007 was that on 11 6 2007, he found out about the sale deed and the same day. Notice sent to the plaintiff to the plaintiff. During the cross-examination, the statement that, prior to the petition, he applied to obtain a certified copy of the sale agreement, which was given to him on 26 2007 2007. And that he had learned of the sale four days before he made such an application. Such statement of the plaintiff made it clear that the plaintiff had learned about the sale of the suit on 21 on 2007 ie the plaintiff had not spoken in this way, long before the date mentioned in the plaintiff. Permission to make such an interpretation as soon as possible after receiving knowledge of the suit sale, was a clear violation of Section 13 of the North West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act 1987 ? Suite dismissed in circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
