AMAN ULLAH versus PAKISTAN TOBACCO BOARD, PROVINCE OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA
The Article 199 Constitution contained the auction of a tobacco cess recovery agreement in which the auction contract for the cessation of tobacco cess was canceled, in which the applicant was the highest bidder, but was canceled and New advertised bidders were invited to participate in the redesign process. On June 28, 29 and 30, 2010, applicants and respondents were marked on June 28, but there was no auction operation on that date, on June 29 there were only three people, one of whom The defendant was also involved. And the highest bid submitted by the respondent to this date, it was shown that the auction proceedings have been accepted, cannot be called transparent in the circumstances, when earlier canceled without any credible reason. , The ad was given three dates, namely 28, 29 and 30 June, 2010, for auction, but that ended on June 29, 2010. In this case, unnecessary delay was not specified in the auction proceedings. The separation was made and the authorities were instructed to auction the auction after fulfilling the formal requirements for a codal. Within a fortnight
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
