Find a Lawyer

SULTAN AHMAD versus LATIF AHMAD

Final Title Factors Declaration of Ownership of Title Title42 By Two Courts Final Factors: The Defendants Claimed to Own the Suitable Land and Attempted to Reform the Record of Incomes Trial Court and Lower Appellate Court Defendants Had decided on the matter in favor of The limitation filed by the defendants was restricted by the fact that the plaintiffs were proprietors to the extent of 4/11 shares, therefore, they were co-owners with the defendants in room numbers and therefore: The question was not attracted to any kind of interference. Or that the error by the defendants was the result of their being inferior by the lower courts, after both the scanning of the entire material available on the record and the subjective inspection, the plaintiffs passed the claim and filed the plaintiff's claim. As was acknowledged. No irregularities or illegal acts were committed in his favor and in recording decisions. The decisions of the lower courts were not in any way irrevocable with respect to the attack and waiver excluded from the review. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PUKHTOONKHWA through Secretary, B.O.R. v. Mst. KHAISTA JANA alias BILQUIS KHISRO 2011 PLD 178
• MUHAMMAD KHAN alias KHALIFA v. HAYATULLAH KHAN 2011 MLD 181
• Haji HAFEEZ ULLAH v. PERSONAL OFFICER (SECURITY DIVISION), KARACHI 2011 PLC 184
• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS PARVEZ v. QABOOL KHAN 2011 PCrLJ 185
• Haji MUHAMMAD AYAZ KHAN v. Malik KHAN AYAZ KHAN 2011 PLD 187
• MANZOOR AHMAD v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 2011 MLD 189
• AURANGZEB v. State 2011 YLR 191
• ABDUL REHMAN v. State 2011 PLD 192

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

female advocates from Lala rukh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes