MUHAMMAD WAHEED versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY MANSEHRA
Regarding the findings of the FIR, Section 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 420, 468 and 471, using forged documents as a forged document, report submitted by Section H It is stated that under section 420, PPC, no offense was a preliminary action. In most cases, applicants can be prosecuted under sections 46868 and 1 471, CRPC, unless the original receipt is available to the police or it is used as a base document with no base and fraud. Yes, because under Section 6868 & 1 471, CCPs were cognizable offenses, for information on the commission of an unlawful crime, there should have been entry in the journal or the station diary, if the police would be able to initiate an investigation, Then they must take action under Section 155, CRPC. And obtaining an order from the magistrate; and if any arrest is to be effected, this can be done only after obtaining an arrest warrant under Section 155 (3), CCPC, in the present case, alleged fake. The receipt was presented by the applicant to the court as it could be used. The original document, then, will be the court complaining against the applicants under Section 155 (3), CCPC and not on the basis of the report of the defendant / Section HOIR, CRPC Section H under Section 154. Could not be registered directly against the beneficiaries. In the absence of an original receipt, Section HA had, in the circumstances, abused and misused the law process by violating the clear-cut provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section HA filed Section 155, CRPC May
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
