Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAVEED SULTAN versus NIAZ AHMAD

Section 2 (b) and 16 law marriages (10 of 1984), Article 161 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 141 will not be a scope rental controller judicial officer under examination by a witness. Sitting silently watching the proceedings, instead of having all the powers of the judicial officer to control the jurisdiction which a witness like a judicial officer of a civil judicial jurisdiction under the evidence preparation provisions You can put questions on To satisfy your conscience, to discover the truth and to clarify ambiguities in the proceedings based on the principles of your statement.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• Mst. ANILA v. Mst. RAFIA 2011 YLR 593
• Mrs. RANIA IBRAHIM QURESHI v. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, ABBOTTABAD 2011 PCrLJ 594
• BANOORI CUSTOMS AGENCY, AIRPORT, PESHAWAR v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEALS), PESHAWAR 2011 PTD 596
• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM QASMI v. Syed AQIL SHAH 2011 CLC 606
• ABDULLAH HAROON v. State 2011 PCrLJ 607
• SARDAR HAFEEZ v. State 2011 PCrLJ 611
• MUHAMMAD WAHEED v. S.H.O. POLICE STATION CITY MANSEHRA 2011 MLD 613
• TAHIR MEHMOOD AFRIDI v. MUHAMMAD DAYAR 2011 YLR 615

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

top advocate from Fizagat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes