Section 302 (b) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (X-Xin of 1965), Section 13 convict MD and evidence of possessing a weapon, the confessional statement of the accused, the eyewitness and medical evidence, have proved the case against the accused. Was not done In these cases, the trial court could not be released by the accused's lawyer, the trial decision did not require any interference, punishment and punishment on both the legal and factual parties as provided by the trial court under section 302. Was registered, the PPC was retained. However, under Section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, the conviction of the accused was set aside because the shotgun was not recovered from the possession of the accused, but was presented by the father of Section 382B, Benefit. The CRPC was also extended to the accused. And the review filed by the complainant was also dropped to increase the conviction
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
