Sections 9 (c), 32 and 74 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 516A, 523A and 561A dismissed an application for drug possession and the use of a vehicle for the offense allegedly used by the owner. The applicant was a good buyer of the vehicle to consider abolishing the applicant's exit order and handed it over to the driver to earn a living and was given the Narcotic Material Act Control Act 1997 on the release of the vehicle Was held by the accused in Section 74 The vehicle involved in the transport of drugs on "superdrive" may not be temporarily released during the trial, however, the absolute bar for the release of the vehicle cannot be made, if Narcotic Substance Control Section 32 Accordingly, it was established that the owner of the vehicle had no knowledge that the drug was taken into his vehicle, which could also be used to release judicial discretion. Vehicle on Superdriver; In view of the principle that, if the final court can grant final relief, it also has the inherent jurisdiction to grant temporary relief, before the pending applicant can, under law The condition must be fulfilled that will eventually get relief from the court. The temporary evaluation of the record shows that the applicant was the real owner of the vehicle for the first time. And if it had been given to him on Superdy. Thereafter, it will be in the interest of justice for the indefinite period of waiting for the trial against the delivery of heavy surety bonds, but under the preparation of original documents of ownership, it will be in the interest of justice. Directed to deliver
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
