The notice of section 13 pre-amnesty Talbot Mohibat, Proof Plant Performance and Student Assessment, shows that on 279 2003, the plaintiff learned of a contract for sale of a suit land by his brother and he had learned of the student on 28 9 2003. Created notice of notice. He sent a message to the plaintiff's brother during a cross-examination on 29 April 2003 that, one day before the drafting of such notice, he received information about such work and such information. Delivered to the plaintiff the next day. It was necessary for the plaintiff to cite the date, time and place mentioned in the notice of publication and notice of the performance of the student publication without any activity and then to prove the same in the same pattern and manner during the trial. Such statement of the plaintiff's brother was found on the 27th 2003, one day before the drafting of such notice, when he received such notice and the plaintiff was informed on the following: 289 In 2003, the plaintiff's position that he had demonstrated the student motibat on 279 2003, he rejected his brother's statement that he had informed the plaintiff on the day when such notice was prepared ie 28. 9 The plaintiff failed to prove Tal Q in 2003 that the suit was dismissed under the terms of the Compensation Law. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
