O IX, R 13 The request for separation from the former party decree is for the plaintiff requesting that he not be summoned, after which his signature was forged. And that he had taken leave four days before filing such an application on 23 11 2006 to learn of the 27 9 2006 ruling that the plaintiff had filed two lawsuits against the defendant, one So on the basis of the second pro note for recovery of the balance and the record showed that the defendant was presented by the same processor server in both cases at the same time and date on which the execution server report. Was affirmed by an affidavit, the defendant did not refuse to seek summons in the pro note suit. One of the defendants' summons was signed and for unknown reasons the other defendant's affidavit was affixed with forged signatures while the probe by the plaintiff in the Nawaz note suit suggested that it had a positive suggestion (second). The present case) is under trial in plaintiff's court against the plaintiff. Was personally presented and he intentionally. Defendant was not entitled to a deliberate refusal to appear in court to delay the trial's decision. Any application for a pre-parte decree was dismissed under circumstances.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
