BANOORI CUSTOMS AGENCY, AIRPORT, PESHAWAR versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (APPEALS), PESHAWAR
Sections 80, 208 (1), 209 (3) and 194 Goods Rules, 2006, 2r (c) and 17 Assess the duty of the principal and agent to pay the commercial quantities, determine the audit of the applicant's records. The air was cleared without commercial fines, etc., and the deputy collector of the principal and his clearing agent Customs paid a small sum through his stable order to deposit the original amount, which was in short salary. The collector dismissed the appeal against the order in original verification two. The question that was cleared by the agency against T and two refrigerators was whether it was said that two T's and two refrigerators would be appreciated in commercial quantities as stated in the Goods Rules 2006, KR2 (C). And does R17 explain the aforementioned rules? Aspects of section 209 of section 209 of the Customs Act 1969 will be taken into account when it comes to the actual jurisdiction of section 20 (3). The Earning Agent provided that where no duty was imposed for any reason or the minor was mistakenly returned for any reason, in the present case, except for the default, negligence or default of the agent. Such customs duty cannot be obtained from the agent. Determine whether it was a deliberate act or negligence or default by the agent. Or it was just a mistake and not deliberately involved in any of the proceedings, in which case, the adjusting officer was referred to examine these aspects. And assigning responsibility for the clearing agent and others involved, issuing an order to speak
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
