Attempts to commit Section 302 (b) / 324/337 F (ii) / 337 F (iii) / 34 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Qatl e amd, Qatl e amd and unlicensed weapons. The evidence for the testimony was appreciated by the prosecution witnesses, including four witnesses, especially the prosecution witness, who was injured during the incident. The statement on which the other witness's testimony was substantiated cannot be ruled out. The accused and the complaining party were closely related to each other and the question of false allegations by the witness of the injured prosecutor did not prove beyond any doubt, as nothing was brought on the record I was told that the witness was not present on the occasion. Or he had charged the accused because of his personal woes, but no material contradiction was brought to the record by the defense, even though it was examined at length and the accused was arrested by the unqualified witness. ? And the recovery of the pistol, which was sent to the forensic science laboratory when it was empty, resulted in a positive and confirmed version of the prosecution, which could be delayed if there were a post-mortem report. It could have been self-described and it was not life-threatening. It was not proven that it was intended for discussion and consultation. Two of the prosecution's witnesses were rightly acquitted. The quantity and quality of the witnesses should not be taken into consideration, the prosecutor had a preference for selecting the number of witnesses, which in his opinion was sufficient to prove the case if the evidence presented by the prosecution depended on the reliability and reliability.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
