Find a Lawyer

AZAM KHAN versus SHAFIE ULLAH KHAN

Article 13 Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 177 Pre-Testimonial Notice, Proof photostat copy performance of such notice is valid in its author's statement without proof of evidence and two minor witnesses without evidence. The original such notice was to be in the possession of the seller, thus, the pre-emptor had no choice but to produce his photostat copy, which would be sufficient to substantiate the evidence of such Talbot pre-evidence. Proof of receipt of such notice by the shopkeeper through the card. The evidence for the postman suit was decided in the circumstances

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• RAFIULLAH v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1942
• SULTAN v. SHAFIULLAH 2011 CLC 1946
• Syed AMEER HUSSAIN SHAH v. Syed DILBAR HUSSAIN SHAH 2011 MLD 1956
• Mst. MIR SHAHBANO v. AHMAD KHAN 2011 YLR 1965
• MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE v. State 2011 PCrLJ 1976
• GAGGAN CATERING SERVICE v. BALANA RESTAURANT through Authorized Partner 2011 CLC 1985
• KHUSH DIL KHAN v. Haji DILAWAR KHAN 2011 MLD 1993
• MOSAM KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Finance Department 2011 CLC 1994

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

registration advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes