GAGGAN CATERING SERVICE versus BALANA RESTAURANT THROUGH AUTHORIZED PARTNER
Sections 42 and 54 of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules, 2004 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OLXX, RR1 and 2 Suite Declaration and Permanent Prohibition Catering Agreement, Plaintiff's Award, which were awarded by Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Was given by Defendant's agreement without tenders floating in electronic and print media whereby the plaintiff was denied fair competition through the tendering process, O xxxx, RR 1 & 2, the tendering process under CPC, To prevent such an agreement from being prosecuted. The court dismissed such a request, when the appellate court suspended the letter-of-intent question whether the plaintiff was informed of the bidding process and whether the airline corporation issued the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Rules 2004 Will be determined once the pro is recorded or not. Conflicting evidence from the parties is the same as granting full relief to the establishment order. Full relief cannot be granted in the interim relief. The airline corporation cannot sue for a preliminary injunction and cannot complete other essential components for interim injunction. The High Court has, on an unlawful order, restored the trial court with a directive to restore it. Decide the suit within a specific period within r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
