The suit property for possession of section 8 suit was originally owned by the interests of the plaintiff in the interest of the plaintiff, it is said that the original owner, a registered general power of attorney, was authorized by the plaintiff's father to be his Act on behalf of the Attorney General for the maintenance of the property. ; And to separate his property by mortgage, sale, exchange, gift, etc., the plaintiff's father stated that the power of attorney had acquired the suit property in favor of his son / claimant through the possession of the registered gift deed defendant. Disposed of Under claimant's physical possession, the claimant was licensed to the property. In such cases, it was neither possible nor necessary to verify the gift, nor could the gift be affected by custody without the delivery of a gift, nor could a third person, as well as a person, envy the donor and the father. The claimant did not own the property. If the defendant was the owner of the suit property then there was a question of the validity of the gift and the inheritance of the said property, it would have been lawful and legal, but when he was only the lawyer of the original owner, there was no question. His privilege - or any other legal heir the plaintiff or another would be born with - was up to Lux Standi to question the authenticity of the gift in favor of the plaintiff's counsel for the defendants, from filing an interference trial to review. Unable to conclude from the conclusions of the facts of the two courts, any misreading or reading of jurisprudence or reading of the jurisdiction, the High Court cannot interfere with the exercise of jurisdiction. General Chat Chat Lounge r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
