Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 553 Boundary Act (IX of 1908), Article 2020 the plaintiffs with a permanent injunction because they were disputed because of the ownership of the disputed land. The lawsuit is filed for declaration for those who are enjoying the land. And the entries in the record of the revenue were in excess of the shares of the defendants who were responsible for the correction, and further claimed that the house was ancestral and in the joint possession of all the legal heritage, it was claimed that this hope According to the case, the case has been banned. The trial court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeal on the same basis, dismissing the claims of the plaintiffs, the two settlement proceedings were first conducted in 1905 06, and subsequently, in 1948 and under 49. In the Rights Record The settlement of the above two settlements was recorded as the property of the disputed land government and includes the possession of a military officer. The registration of the plaintiff and the defendants was filed within six years from the date of the first registration. Which he did not avail, therefore, in this case it was expressly time-barred that the review request was dismissed by the High Court through any evidence.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
