Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALIL KHAN versus SALAH-UD-DIN

Section 118 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O. XXXVII, RR 2 and 3 of the Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 59 suit signed by the defendant in the signature and written statement and evidence report on the promissory note The handwriting expert showed the defendant's signature on the Defendant's note, not his signature card. The promise was not of the defendant on the Caliphate and there was nothing to prove that the expert's opinion was otherwise relevant due to the failure of the test plaintiff when the promissory note was not substantiated.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• ABDUL RASHID v. State 2011 PCrLJ 495
• Miss RUKHSANA QURESHI v. PROVINCE OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary Planning Cell, Sports, Cultural, Tourism Archaeology and Mus 2011 PLC(CS) 495
• AKBAR KHAN v. ALLIED BANK OF PAKISTAN through President 2011 YLR 496
• AMIR ABDULLAH v. ZAFAR KHAN 2011 CLC 499
• SAJID MUNEER v. Doctor MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH KHAN 2011 CLC 508
• SULAIM GUL v. ABDUR REHMAN 2011 YLR 511
• KHAN AFSAR v. SHAN MUHAMMAD 2011 CLC 516
• FIRDOS KHAN v. ZAIN MUHAMMAD 2011 MLD 521

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

inheritance advocates near Kundina lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes