Section 42 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 4 (9) and 42 Land Settlement Manual, Para 123 Suit for Declaration of Trial Appeal Court dismissed Appeal Court dismissed Appeal Court Presenting the case precisely, the appeal was dismissed as the absence of evidence was not confirmed by the assets belonging to the same change, which shows that these two villages had two different income taxes. The property is shown. The decree was based on an incorrect / inaccurate view of the definition of the word "state" in the appeal, citing an area for which a separate record of rights was maintained, making the two villages a revenue record. The fact that two different commercial properties of a proof were made in the section 4 (9) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 does not mean that the definition of the word 'State word' does not necessarily include a State. , Or fun, or goon or pund, usually similar to a state or a palace village or a mausoleum, but a state may include more than one village, and a village Two states may be involved, not complying with the provisions of section 42 of West Pakistan. The Land Revenue Act, 1967 does not invalidate transactions in which there are interchangeable court cases in which evidence is not examined and according to law, the results of the trial court are publicized, appeal to the case. The remand for a court decision was obtained \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
