Section 13 Dialogue for Discrimination The plaintiff was left to mention the exact day, month, and year of the sale of the suit property before the importer had to express his intention in the same sitting and meeting where he was to sell. Information about them. The plaintiff had, on the basis of his knowledge of the time, declared the performance of the talaq as permissible and the plaintiff himself stated against the provisions of the law that, two months after obtaining the information and knowledge of the plaintiff, he gave notice of the student's notice. Was not given within time as required by the law and was defective and the law was not in accordance with the appellate court's requirements, while rejecting this case, the conclusions were made on the basis of the evidence of the parties, In the absence of any illegality, the High Court upheld that result.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
