Revised judgment dated 7-11 2002, against section 115 and AXXII, Rr 3 and 4 deceased, was filed under which the High Court's application was repeatedly filed by the legal heirs of the deceased's legal heritage, dated 23 1 2003. Despite the orders, they were not implemented by the petitioner. In order to bring the record filed on 20 6 2009, the petition was accepted by the applicant under Sections 151 and 153, CPC, 14 1 2011, that the legal proceedings brought on the record to the deceased's legacy. Will be sufficient for all legal purposes and purposes. The legal inheritance in the request for review can hardly be termed as a clear error but the gross negligence and lack of remorse in pursuit of it, which cannot be ignored as a valuable right, as the defendant received. The petitioner neither applied for delay nor offered any justification. Allegations can be regarded as mere technical expertise, even if the court's repeated instructions for error or inaction for not executing the deceased's legal heritage are dismissed by the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
