In Article 2 (2) and at e am the morning and the attempt to appreciate the evidence, the only witness in the case, who was the victim's brother, was an interesting witness. The witness's brother needs a thorough examination. It was stated that he was with the deceased in collecting his pension, could not be ascertained as there was no definite evidence that there was serious doubt about the presence of the witness, who was also the complainant, at the time of the incident. Claimed to have been with the deceased, which was prepared at the behest of the complainant. It has been indicated that the complainant has been charged with ineffective firing, which will have another effect in the prosecutor's story if the version given by the complainant as the only witness to the incident Observe that, the facts show that in the absence of any supporting evidence, the testimony of the complainant / witness, cannot be construed to be that of the accused, which has been spread over the years, in the absence of any material alone. The basis for the accused's conviction cannot be established and credible and credible evidence is used to link the accused to the crime. What were the reasons for which they were accused of. The incident was an unlawful incident and the general testimony given by the complainant, as an interested witness, cannot be relied upon for the accused to be convicted. The trial court set aside the accused was subsequently acquitted of the charges and was released
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
