Claims that Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Article 409/420/468/477 of fraud, fraudulent breach, denial of bail, purpose of account fraud and fraudulent action It has been alleged that fraud and misconduct has been committed by the bank's subordinate staff even if no such assumption is made, it can be said that the accused was not knowledgeable about depositing huge sums. ? Millions, because it was not a day-to-day business, but statements spanning three months, bank records related to account holders, affiliations, compensation and other available records linked the accused to the crime and the bank involved in the case. Under the rules of the money laundering officers could not excuse themselves from the duties placed on their shoulders while the account holders were deprived of their savings if the public benefit was also damaged. Due to such violations, suffered and the trust and confidence of the banking system records were searched Does not suggest that the prosecution proceedings against the accused were either illegal or that evidence gathered in support of the allegations against the accused by a special-role FIR prosecution attributed to them in the illegal jurisdiction. In which it was shown that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the crime was committed by them. Prohibited clause of section 497 (1), accusing the PC that they are not entitled to bail privileges, their bail pleas dismissed
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
