Sections 302/337 H / 337 F (ii) The victim is hurting from a speedy or negligent act and the evidence is appreciated The complainant who took advantage of the suspect who was the sitting DSP of the area, Had made some improvements and left some. The defendant's witness, who tried to deal with some of the self-inflicted facts on the record, also made dishonest improvements by presenting the case at trial and altogether withdrew from his statement under section 161, p. CK's medical evidence completely denied the ocular account. The two so-called witnesses made a serious argument, even knowing that they had lied that they were under oath. They made crude efforts to conceal / suppress the facts contained on the record; dishonest suppression of the facts on the record adversely affects the authenticity of the witnesses' testimony and strongly suggests that the dead body be injured. It was someone else's job. One person, but three real brothers were charged with firing effectively at the fatal shooting. It was a minor incident and the complainant, a highly experienced senior police officer, had to know about the weapons available to the accused, but he refused to give him details of the weapons of the accused. The misleading of the matter speaks of the fact that the complainant was not present on the occasion at the time the complainant was a sitting DSP of the area and in all likelihood he should have his influence. Subordinate Investigation Officer opened a false rifle against the accused
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
