Section 497 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 of the possession, import, export and trafficking of drugs, grant of a pre-bail application by the accused The High Court dismissed. The trial was not started against the accused, despite the trial court's direction to terminate the trial in the shortest time possible, but not two months later, despite the High Court's direction, saying the delay was not attributed to the accused. Maybe, because he benefited. The legal right to submit an application for your age determination. It was the duty of the prosecution to obtain the accused's default age at the time of the investigation, but before that it appeared that the prosecution had deliberately avoided setting the age of the accused when the prosecution failed to follow the directions of the High Court. Failed to present a reason. The specific direction was issued by a superior court, it must be followed, or at least some efforts have been made to achieve that goal, in this case, the court has no obligation to comply with the directive. No action was taken, which was made. There was not enough room for the extension of the accused on bail, otherwise there would be no possibility of trial in the near future, the case for fresh land bail was presented in favor of the culprit, who was convicted. Was entered, circumstances r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
