Sections 9, 10 and 22 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OVII, R 11, for the defense of suit loan application and for the defense of the claimant / lender's denial. Petition filed for leave filed by the plaintiff against the bank filed a petition for leave to defend the suit Defending the bank recovery suit filed by the bank under and under VII, R 11, CPC. Was denied leave in which the bank's claim was barred regardless of the legal and factual issues raised by the lender. In order to defend the case and to defend the case without having to file a leave application, it was legally binding to consider all the facts and legal applications raised by the Banking Court under legal status. Under the law, the banking court was obliged to pass judgment and judgment in favor of the plaintiff after considering it if the leave application for defense of the case was denied or the defendant failed to meet the conditions attached had lived. The leave allowed for the defense should be based on the application of the mind on any order / decision and without the judgment decided in the declaration case for reasons it was stated that the Banking Court was allowed to defend the matter. Instead of providing your findings on the application for, leave for defense to be denied and in that same breath, the plaintiff was rejected under O VII, R 11, the CPC Banking Court of CPC, Section 10 (11) of the Financial Institutions. In the case of refusal of leave from defense, a decree was required. Finance) Ordinance, 2001, if the plaintiff's
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
