Find a Lawyer

BAKHT SHER versus JANAN

Sections 279, 320, 337 G & 427 Driving or aboard a public road, speedily neglect, or negligence By the prosecution, the testimony of the injured witnesses who support the prosecution's version cannot be ruined even on a reasonable basis. And reliable evidence was available, the prosecution would not be fatal to the witness of the case even though the accused was identified in court but could not yet be sentenced. Appeals of the accused identified by the witness in court were accepted and he was acquitted of the charges.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011

• SHERZADA v. COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, PESHAWAR 2011 PTD 301
• ALI KHAN v. ASKARI LEASING LTD. 2011 CLD 307
• SAID AMIN v. Mst. NAYAB 2011 CLC 309
• IMRAN SHAH v. Mrs. DIL PART JANA 2011 YLR 311
• MUHAMMAD RABI v. ISMAIL KHAN 2011 YLR 323
• FAZAL ELLAHI v. AKHTAR ALI 2011 CLC 334
• MUHAMMAD ALAMGIR v. State 2011 YLR 341
• KASHIF NADEEM v. AIMAL KHAN 2011 PCrLJ 342

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2011 →

online advocate from Punch lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes