Section 42 of the Qanun Shahadat (1984, 1984 of 1984), the change in the certificate was affirmed by the seller of the declaration in Article 117 suit (predecessor in the interest of the plaintiff) was alleged to be fraudulent. Because this seller was crazy and was admitted to the mantle. 8 8 The hospital and his death there on 28 1951, 1952 wherein the record of the hospital presented to the court did not record any records regarding the departure of the shopkeepers between 1958 1952 and 28 1 1981, while the record keeper. Expressed his disqualification about such an entry record keeper. Regarding the ignorance of whether the vendor was discharged from the hospital from time to time or he remained in-patient during that time, the vendor's sheet presented to the court on 22 6 1972 and 29 10 1977 check-up report Of course, but they had no entry on it. From time to time, from the hospital or the pharmacy, he suggested that it was not the shopkeeper's case that the seller's insanity was examined by Wendy's son rather than by the vendor himself, who was neither in the witness list. And does not mention it in the list of witnesses nor examines the identity of the minor witness and the suit mutation, which was alive after the court refused to issue a summons against it. Patwari Circle and Vice President Kinnego have been told that they did not join their list of witnesses, but provided them with an opportunity to present, and failed to do so, Wendy did not list their witnesses. Neither the private witnesses examined nor any evidence from the eligible area. Or the relatives of the shopkeeper prove this
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2011
