M.C.B. BANK LTD. THROUGH GENERAL MANAGER versus MALIK EJAZ
Sections 46 and 48 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Sections 0 15 (2), (3) (e) Application for a dismissal of service Compulsory dismissal of employment as a mandatory retirement appeal employee. Had to change to `Complaint against dismissal of service by the employee after dismissal of the service after investigating them on charge of serving with him with the charge of the letter and unauthorized absence of duty duty against him. Upon entering, the Labor Court found the employee guilty of corruption, but his dismissal of the job was changed to Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, Mandatory Retirement Validity Standing Order No. 15 (2) of 1968, Under which a penalty of four years was imposed, which did not prevent the growth or development of more than one year. Reduction to one lesser position; and any dismissal of employment, beyond that it was said that the sentence would be illegal, with no jurisdiction and unjustified labor court, under the circumstances, the termination of employment without legal support in compulsory retirement. That could not uphold the Labor Court's decision to that extent. The job will be restored for a period of one year, but the sentence was changed to prevent a one-year increase, but because of the mismanagement, he is not entitled to wages for that period. Was. He did not perform duty and this period would be considered unpaid leave \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2011
