NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRESIDENT versus ZAHID HUSSAIN
Sections 41 and 55 of the Service Suspension Complaint Employee, whose services were terminated without notice, personal hearing or any inquiry, arbitrarily filed a complaint before the Labor Court, which accepted Was taken, and the employee was ordered to be laid off from the job, but to no avail, the employer bank filed an appeal against the Labor Court's decision by which the employee was reinstated, while the employee challenged the decision. Under which it was denied previous benefits. According to the legality, all the points raised by the parties were legally settled by the Labor Court. And correctly appreciated and analyzed the evidence presented by the parties. The employee was a permanent employee and because of the length of his services, his dismissal was arbitrary, the appeal against the Labor Court decision was dismissed without unfair and misconception without legal authority and the Labor order was handed over to the cross appeal. The court was retained in relation to the restitution of employees from the date of the appointment of employees to be satisfied with the Labor Court order / decision in which he was declared a permanent employee. He was declared a permanent employee of seniority, publicity, etc. Employees self-confessed that they were running a public call. The Labor Court was open, fair and equitable in obtaining livelihood orders through the Labor Court for non-return of employees, in which case
