Section 2 (xxx), 46, 47 (3) and 48 of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section 2 (I) and Section O12 service removal application Determination \ Employee was originally appointed as Sales Officer in the Establishment and after that he was appointed as Territory Manager \ Later, the employee's services were terminated and the employee complained against the order. Application filed Since the employee was appointed to the establishment by the management staff, he was not an employee and his request for complaint was not a labor court, however, the employee accepted the grievance request as a 'worker' to his full advantage. was done. Employees filed an appeal against the decision by the Labor Court primarily on the grounds that the employee was not a hired worker because he was appointed as an officer in the executive officers, and his job was made a trait manager in the Life Sciences business. And its main function was to promote the sale of Establishment Acid Test Pharmaceutical products for the determination of whether the employee was an employee or not, if the duties were performed by him, the employee would be an employee, whether of a manual or knowledgeable nature. And otherwise, the Cell Promotion Officer / Employee was expected to demonstrate the quality of initiative, intelligence and accurate speculation. And for this work he was given some freedom in his ranks. The process is expected to allow such an employee to use their mental faculties to find new ways to promote sales. The salesman's work was different from manual work or maulvi's work and thus it did not fit the circumstances of the worker / employee.
