O XXI, R 32 Defendants preventing interruption to the water channel of a permanent ruler shall not interfere with the smooth running of such channel before the High Court by the decision-maker of a permanent injunction In order to use it, the order of the execution court has been directed to grant the verdict of Rs 50,000 for the failure of such order to the decision debtor in the second execution request. Show that the decision makers were at the bottom of interfering with such a channel. The executive court also saw that the decision lender was interfering with such a channel, that the judge's lender was neither ready to accept such an order nor had it been in a high court before. There was no grace in acting before any litigation began. Interference with such a channel after passing a decree in favor of each is like a breach of the guarantee bond, and the reason for the breach of the due process for reconsideration provides a genuine basis. If the bail already provided for it will be seized upon its proof. Violation The High Court dismissed the circumstances review request
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2011
